top of page

The Fasting Life

Public·28 members
Mahmood Gusev
Mahmood Gusev

Atari St Cubase Crack Mac



perhaps i am biased as i have two and have used them since the mid 80s (when i bought them new).. but these where specifically design by the atari team for music, hence having midi ports built in, and directly bused to the cpu. we have made jokes for years about nothing ever being tighter, and it's actually noticeable compared to a mac.




Atari St Cubase Crack Mac



yes, it's not OSC, and the granularity of midi could never be compared, but usually running 16 relatively chord heavy tracks and even spitting out sysex at the same time, the atari really is incredible.


I wish ataris where still in production as they where the best for midi sequencing. The moment a company makes an Atari style/Cubase style sequencer I think it will be the new bench mark. I have been making tracks for 25 years and the problems I have these days with PCs and timing, etc has been enough to send me round the bend.Lets hope people will make one. More memory , but same style and sytem.


What if you have a synth which is not currently supported by the Studio Module? Well, included on the Cubase CD is a program called DMaker which is used to create drivers. Many people have complained that DMaker is too complicated but, in reality, it's the variety and complexity of synthesizer SysEx data that makes it a tough nut to crack. Few people understand SysEx well enough to create a driver themselves and, since each synth has its own data format, patch name location within the data, and so on, each driver must be approached seperately. Explainging DMaker would take an article (or two) by itself. All I'll say here is that if you are really confident, the source of all the existing drivers is on the Cubase CD and, by studying the driver of a synth as similar as possible to yours, you might start to understand how DMaker works. Good luck!


About

Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...

Members

bottom of page